"Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:Xns94FA48CD606meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who posted
> this on 30 May 2004...
>
>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:Xns94F9EED196C10meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who posted
>>> this on 30 May 2004...
>>>
>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns94F9EBD4BC535meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:Xns94F9E853B7702meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
news:Xns94F9BB4CB6B73meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "silvertop_10" <silvertop_10@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> news:3ec2d9a9.0405300616.4ae850ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>> I WANT TO POINT SOME FAULTS IN FEMALE (MODELS) APPEAR ON TV,
>>>>>>>>>>> FILMS AND IN SONGS, IF WE MEASURE THE FIGURES OF THESE
>>>>>>>>>>> MODELS ON INTERNATIONAL SMARTNESS METER, THEY ALL ARE UNFIT
>>>>>>>>>>> OR ZERO,FIRST WE HAVE TO KNOW THAT WHAT MEASUREMENT IS
>>>>>>>>>>> METER. HOW TO MEASURE THE BODY FIGURE Of A MODEL ON
>>>>>>>>>>> SMARTNESS METER,IN THE WORLD THERE IS A SIMPLE
>>>>>>>>>>> STANDARD.WHEN ANY FEMALE MODEL NEED WEAR TO BRAZIERS UNDER
>>>>>>>>>>> OUR CLOTHES FOR PROMINENT/SHOW OUR BREASTS, ITS MEAN SHE
>>>>>>>>>>> HAVE NOT GOOD FIGURE OR BREASTS. OR SHE HAVE SOME
>>>>>>>>>>> ABNORMALITY IN HER BREASTS.
>>>>>>>>>>> IN SHOWBIZ ALL FEMALE MODELS APPERAS WITH WEARING BRAZIER
>>>>>>>>>>> INSIDE OUR CLOTHES, AND WITH THESE KIND OF DRESSING HER
>>>>>>>>>>> BREASTS LOOKS LIKE AN ARTIFICIAL AIR BALOONS,OR A KIND OF
>>>>>>>>>>> VEGETABLE, DUE TO THIS THE GIRLS LOST ALL OUR *** APPEAL AND
>>>>>>>>>>> ATTRACTION. IT IS A QUESTION FOR FEMALE MODELS , ARE THEY
>>>>>>>>>>> UNFIT ON WORLD'S STANDARDS? N WHY THEY CANT PERFORM OR
>>>>>>>>>>> CANNOT SHOW OUR BREASTS WITHOUT WEARING BRAZIER INSIDE OUR
>>>>>>>>>>> CLOTHES. IN WESTERN STANDARDS SMART FEMALES HATE TO WEAR
>>>>>>>>>>> BRAZIER INSIDE CLOTHS, BECAUSE THEY HAVE FIRM BREASTS AND
>>>>>>>>>>> DON'T NEED THE HELP OF BRAZIERS TO SHOW OR PROMINENT THEM
>>>>>>>>>>> TO PROVE OURSELVES A COMPLETE FEMALE. IF A FEMALE WEAR
>>>>>>>>>>> BRAZIERS POEPLE THINK ABOUT THAT MAYBE SHE HAVE SMALL LOOSE
>>>>>>>>>>> OR UNBALANCED BREASTS, OR MAYBE SHE HAVE SOME KIND OF
>>>>>>>>>>> ABNORMALITY IN HER BREASTS AND TRYING TO COVER THIS DEFECT
>>>>>>>>>>> WITH THE HELP OF BRAZIERS.
>>>>>>>>>>> EVERY BODY KNOWS AND BELEAVE THAT WITHOUT BRAZIER BREASTS
>>>>>>>>>>> LOOKS 100 TIMES ATTRACTIVE BEAUTIFUL & ***Y IN THEIR NATURAL
>>>>>>>>>>> CURVES, WHEN WOMEN APPEAR WITHOUT WEARING BRAZIERS INSIDE
>>>>>>>>>>> ****RT HER NATURAL BREASTS CURVES LOOKS MANY TIMES NATURAL &
>>>>>>>>>>> ATTRACTIVE AND BREAK THE HEARTS OF VIEWERS. THE CURVES OF
>>>>>>>>>>> BREASTS NIPPLES INSIDE FROM DRESS WORK LIKE A BULLET THAT
>>>>>>>>>>> DIRECTLY HIT THIER HEARTS AND ITS DIFFICULT TO FORGET.
>>>>>>>>>>> I REQUEST TO ALL POEPLE THAT ONLY GIVE CHANCE TO THESE
>>>>>>>>>>> MODELS WHO CAN QUALIFY OURSELVES ON SMARTNESS STANDARD ON
>>>>>>>>>>> THIS METHOD. I THINK MAYBE ALL MODELS WILLBE OUT N NEW
>>>>>>>>>>> GENERATION WILL COME INTO FA****ON N SHOWBIZ WHO WILL
>>>>>>>>>>> QUALIFY THIS STANDARD.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> sms your comments to me at +92 300 9288263
>>>>>>>>>>> GIRLS USE BAZIERS TO HIDE DEFECTS,MAKE POEPLE FOOL,INSIDE
>>>>>>>>>>> SMALL LOOSE UNABALANCE N FOAM OUTLOOK TIGHT N FIRM (36-38)
>>>>>>>>>>> ITS LIE FAKE N FRAUD DONT BELEAVE
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Silvertop,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> After a brief look through your post, I think Craig would be
>>>>>>>>>> very interested in the contents, especially regarding the
>>>>>>>>>> "BRAZIERS", so I have added demon.local to your post in the
>>>>>>>>>> hopes that Craig will see it and possibly order a brazier
>>>>>>>>>> (sic) from you. If he has not answered your post within the
>>>>>>>>>> next forty-eight hours I shall add a s****ting group to the
>>>>>>>>>> groups line and repost.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> HTH. HAND.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You provide such a good public service to Usenet, Wim!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I try to live by my motto: *Must* try harder.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it may reap dividends by Friday!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you think so? (That's 320)
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps. There are still many days to go... and the intervention
>>>>> of a certain Phillip Kyle may prove key!
>>>>
>>>> I know. He and his secretary *and* his bot might at this very
>>>> moment have a veritable flood waiting behind the sluice gates.
>>>
>>> I hope you aren't insinuating that Phillip's posts are mere chaff!
>>>
>>> Does his secretary post as well? I haven't seen her. Perhaps she
>>> releases a few when she's bored of waiting for him to reply to the
>>> im****tant ones.
>>>
>>>> I often seem to lose stamina as the week goes on, *and* I've got a
>>>> bloody clinic to attend on Thursday. I might work a double ****ft
>>>> through tonight just in case.
>>>
>>> Ahh, but what if there's no one around to reply to?
>>>
>>> It's that old karma thing working again...
>>
>> I could create a sock called Deirdre Barlow or something equally
>> stupid.
>
> That would be cheating.
Then I won't do it because cheaters never win.
--
Wim
|
