Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - Monday 397 who posted this on 31 May
2004...
> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:Xns94FA57932172Ameowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who posted
>> this on 31 May 2004...
>>
>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns94FA48CD606meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who posted
>>>> this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>
>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Xns94F9EED196C10meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:Xns94F9EBD4BC535meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>
> news:Xns94F9E853B7702meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>
> news:Xns94F9BB4CB6B73meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "silvertop_10" <silvertop_10@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3ec2d9a9.0405300616.4ae850ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I WANT TO POINT SOME FAULTS IN FEMALE (MODELS) APPEAR ON
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TV, FILMS AND IN SONGS, IF WE MEASURE THE FIGURES OF THESE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MODELS ON INTERNATIONAL SMARTNESS METER, THEY ALL ARE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNFIT OR ZERO,FIRST WE HAVE TO KNOW THAT WHAT MEASUREMENT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IS METER. HOW TO MEASURE THE BODY FIGURE Of A MODEL ON
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SMARTNESS METER,IN THE WORLD THERE IS A SIMPLE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> STANDARD.WHEN ANY FEMALE MODEL NEED WEAR TO BRAZIERS UNDER
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OUR CLOTHES FOR PROMINENT/SHOW OUR BREASTS, ITS MEAN SHE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HAVE NOT GOOD FIGURE OR BREASTS. OR SHE HAVE SOME
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ABNORMALITY IN HER BREASTS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IN SHOWBIZ ALL FEMALE MODELS APPERAS WITH WEARING BRAZIER
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INSIDE OUR CLOTHES, AND WITH THESE KIND OF DRESSING HER
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BREASTS LOOKS LIKE AN ARTIFICIAL AIR BALOONS,OR A KIND OF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VEGETABLE, DUE TO THIS THE GIRLS LOST ALL OUR *** APPEAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AND ATTRACTION. IT IS A QUESTION FOR FEMALE MODELS , ARE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THEY UNFIT ON WORLD'S STANDARDS? N WHY THEY CANT PERFORM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OR CANNOT SHOW OUR BREASTS WITHOUT WEARING BRAZIER INSIDE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OUR CLOTHES. IN WESTERN STANDARDS SMART FEMALES HATE TO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WEAR BRAZIER INSIDE CLOTHS, BECAUSE THEY HAVE FIRM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BREASTS AND DON'T NEED THE HELP OF BRAZIERS TO SHOW OR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PROMINENT THEM TO PROVE OURSELVES A COMPLETE FEMALE. IF A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FEMALE WEAR BRAZIERS POEPLE THINK ABOUT THAT MAYBE SHE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HAVE SMALL LOOSE OR UNBALANCED BREASTS, OR MAYBE SHE HAVE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SOME KIND OF ABNORMALITY IN HER BREASTS AND TRYING TO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> COVER THIS DEFECT WITH THE HELP OF BRAZIERS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EVERY BODY KNOWS AND BELEAVE THAT WITHOUT BRAZIER BREASTS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOOKS 100 TIMES ATTRACTIVE BEAUTIFUL & ***Y IN THEIR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NATURAL CURVES, WHEN WOMEN APPEAR WITHOUT WEARING
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BRAZIERS INSIDE ****RT HER NATURAL BREASTS CURVES LOOKS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MANY TIMES NATURAL & ATTRACTIVE AND BREAK THE HEARTS OF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VIEWERS. THE CURVES OF BREASTS NIPPLES INSIDE FROM DRESS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WORK LIKE A BULLET THAT DIRECTLY HIT THIER HEARTS AND ITS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DIFFICULT TO FORGET.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I REQUEST TO ALL POEPLE THAT ONLY GIVE CHANCE TO THESE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MODELS WHO CAN QUALIFY OURSELVES ON SMARTNESS STANDARD ON
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THIS METHOD. I THINK MAYBE ALL MODELS WILLBE OUT N NEW
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GENERATION WILL COME INTO FA****ON N SHOWBIZ WHO WILL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QUALIFY THIS STANDARD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sms your comments to me at +92 300 9288263
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GIRLS USE BAZIERS TO HIDE DEFECTS,MAKE POEPLE FOOL,INSIDE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SMALL LOOSE UNABALANCE N FOAM OUTLOOK TIGHT N FIRM (36-38)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ITS LIE FAKE N FRAUD DONT BELEAVE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Silvertop,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> After a brief look through your post, I think Craig would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be very interested in the contents, especially regarding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "BRAZIERS", so I have added demon.local to your post
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the hopes that Craig will see it and possibly order a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> brazier (sic) from you. If he has not answered your post
>>>>>>>>>>>>> within the next forty-eight hours I shall add a s****ting
>>>>>>>>>>>>> group to the groups line and repost.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH. HAND.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You provide such a good public service to Usenet, Wim!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I try to live by my motto: *Must* try harder.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think it may reap dividends by Friday!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you think so? (That's 320)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perhaps. There are still many days to go... and the intervention
>>>>>>>> of a certain Phillip Kyle may prove key!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know. He and his secretary *and* his bot might at this very
>>>>>>> moment have a veritable flood waiting behind the sluice gates.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope you aren't insinuating that Phillip's posts are mere chaff!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does his secretary post as well? I haven't seen her. Perhaps she
>>>>>> releases a few when she's bored of waiting for him to reply to the
>>>>>> im****tant ones.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I often seem to lose stamina as the week goes on, *and* I've got
>>>>>>> a bloody clinic to attend on Thursday. I might work a double
>>>>>>> ****ft through tonight just in case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahh, but what if there's no one around to reply to?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's that old karma thing working again...
>>>>>
>>>>> I could create a sock called Deirdre Barlow or something equally
>>>>> stupid.
>>>>
>>>> That would be cheating.
>>>
>>> Then I won't do it because cheaters never win.
>>
>> But wot about KK? You mean to say that he was always proper and
>> honest in achieving his fortune?
>
> But KK is not a winner, oh no. When he is placed on the great scales
> along with all of his illgotten gains he will still be found wanting.
Good job you redeemed yourself with that post!
--
The Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
VISIT ME ONLINE AT: http://peterparsnip.blogspot.com/
"Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with
the rod, he shall not die." -- Proverbs 23:13 (AV)
|
