Be still and pray homage to Illogic Bomb who posted this on 01 Jun 2004...
> go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip) wrote in
> news:Xns94FAC970E8C4meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - Monday 397 who posted this on 31
>> May 2004...
>>
>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns94FA57932172Ameowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who posted
>>>> this on 31 May 2004...
>>>>
>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Xns94FA48CD606meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who posted
>>>>>> this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:Xns94F9EED196C10meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>
news:Xns94F9EBD4BC535meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> news:Xns94F9E853B7702meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> news:Xns94F9BB4CB6B73meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "silvertop_10" <silvertop_10@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3ec2d9a9.0405300616.4ae850ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I WANT TO POINT SOME FAULTS IN FEMALE (MODELS) APPEAR ON
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TV, FILMS AND IN SONGS, IF WE MEASURE THE FIGURES OF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THESE MODELS ON INTERNATIONAL SMARTNESS METER, THEY ALL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ARE UNFIT OR ZERO,FIRST WE HAVE TO KNOW THAT WHAT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MEASUREMENT IS METER. HOW TO MEASURE THE BODY FIGURE Of A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MODEL ON SMARTNESS METER,IN THE WORLD THERE IS A SIMPLE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> STANDARD.WHEN ANY FEMALE MODEL NEED WEAR TO BRAZIERS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNDER OUR CLOTHES FOR PROMINENT/SHOW OUR BREASTS, ITS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MEAN SHE HAVE NOT GOOD FIGURE OR BREASTS. OR SHE HAVE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SOME ABNORMALITY IN HER BREASTS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IN SHOWBIZ ALL FEMALE MODELS APPERAS WITH WEARING
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BRAZIER INSIDE OUR CLOTHES, AND WITH THESE KIND OF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRESSING HER BREASTS LOOKS LIKE AN ARTIFICIAL AIR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BALOONS,OR A KIND OF VEGETABLE, DUE TO THIS THE GIRLS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOST ALL OUR *** APPEAL AND ATTRACTION. IT IS A QUESTION
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FOR FEMALE MODELS , ARE THEY UNFIT ON WORLD'S STANDARDS?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> N WHY THEY CANT PERFORM OR CANNOT SHOW OUR BREASTS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WITHOUT WEARING BRAZIER INSIDE OUR CLOTHES. IN WESTERN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> STANDARDS SMART FEMALES HATE TO WEAR BRAZIER INSIDE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOTHS, BECAUSE THEY HAVE FIRM BREASTS AND DON'T NEED THE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HELP OF BRAZIERS TO SHOW OR PROMINENT THEM TO PROVE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OURSELVES A COMPLETE FEMALE. IF A FEMALE WEAR BRAZIERS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> POEPLE THINK ABOUT THAT MAYBE SHE HAVE SMALL LOOSE OR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNBALANCED BREASTS, OR MAYBE SHE HAVE SOME KIND OF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ABNORMALITY IN HER BREASTS AND TRYING TO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> COVER THIS DEFECT WITH THE HELP OF BRAZIERS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EVERY BODY KNOWS AND BELEAVE THAT WITHOUT BRAZIER BREASTS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOOKS 100 TIMES ATTRACTIVE BEAUTIFUL & ***Y IN THEIR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NATURAL CURVES, WHEN WOMEN APPEAR WITHOUT WEARING
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BRAZIERS INSIDE ****RT HER NATURAL BREASTS CURVES LOOKS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MANY TIMES NATURAL & ATTRACTIVE AND BREAK THE HEARTS OF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VIEWERS. THE CURVES OF BREASTS NIPPLES INSIDE FROM DRESS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WORK LIKE A BULLET THAT DIRECTLY HIT THIER HEARTS AND ITS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DIFFICULT TO FORGET.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I REQUEST TO ALL POEPLE THAT ONLY GIVE CHANCE TO THESE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MODELS WHO CAN QUALIFY OURSELVES ON SMARTNESS STANDARD ON
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THIS METHOD. I THINK MAYBE ALL MODELS WILLBE OUT N NEW
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GENERATION WILL COME INTO FA****ON N SHOWBIZ WHO WILL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QUALIFY THIS STANDARD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sms your comments to me at +92 300 9288263
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GIRLS USE BAZIERS TO HIDE DEFECTS,MAKE POEPLE FOOL,INSIDE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SMALL LOOSE UNABALANCE N FOAM OUTLOOK TIGHT N FIRM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (36-38) ITS LIE FAKE N FRAUD DONT BELEAVE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Silvertop,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After a brief look through your post, I think Craig would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be very interested in the contents, especially regarding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "BRAZIERS", so I have added demon.local to your post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the hopes that Craig will see it and possibly order a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brazier (sic) from you. If he has not answered your post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within the next forty-eight hours I shall add a s****ting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group to the groups line and repost.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH. HAND.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You provide such a good public service to Usenet, Wim!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I try to live by my motto: *Must* try harder.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it may reap dividends by Friday!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think so? (That's 320)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps. There are still many days to go... and the
>>>>>>>>>> intervention of a certain Phillip Kyle may prove key!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I know. He and his secretary *and* his bot might at this very
>>>>>>>>> moment have a veritable flood waiting behind the sluice gates.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I hope you aren't insinuating that Phillip's posts are mere
>>>>>>>> chaff!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does his secretary post as well? I haven't seen her. Perhaps she
>>>>>>>> releases a few when she's bored of waiting for him to reply to
>>>>>>>> the im****tant ones.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I often seem to lose stamina as the week goes on, *and* I've got
>>>>>>>>> a bloody clinic to attend on Thursday. I might work a double
>>>>>>>>> ****ft through tonight just in case.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ahh, but what if there's no one around to reply to?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's that old karma thing working again...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I could create a sock called Deirdre Barlow or something equally
>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That would be cheating.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then I won't do it because cheaters never win.
>>>>
>>>> But wot about KK? You mean to say that he was always proper and
>>>> honest in achieving his fortune?
>>>
>>> But KK is not a winner, oh no. When he is placed on the great scales
>>> along with all of his illgotten gains he will still be found wanting.
>>
>> Good job you redeemed yourself with that post!
>
> THIS WEEK IS MINE, MINE I SAYS!
It will be judging by the overnight tidal wave that I'm now responding to!
--
The Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip
VISIT ME ONLINE AT: http://peterparsnip.blogspot.com/
"Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with
the rod, he shall not die." -- Proverbs 23:13 (AV)
|
