go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip) wrote in
news:Xns94FB5D9FCEF7Bmeowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Be still and pray homage to Illogic Bomb who posted this on 01 Jun
> 2004...
>
>> go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip) wrote in
>> news:Xns94FAC970E8C4meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - Monday 397 who posted this on 31
>>> May 2004...
>>>
>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns94FA57932172Ameowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who posted
>>>>> this on 31 May 2004...
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:Xns94FA48CD606meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
news:Xns94F9EED196C10meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>
news:Xns94F9EBD4BC535meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>> e s
>>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> news:Xns94F9E853B7702meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>> news:Xns94F9BB4CB6B73meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "silvertop_10" <silvertop_10@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3ec2d9a9.0405300616.4ae850ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I WANT TO POINT SOME FAULTS IN FEMALE (MODELS) APPEAR ON
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TV, FILMS AND IN SONGS, IF WE MEASURE THE FIGURES OF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THESE MODELS ON INTERNATIONAL SMARTNESS METER, THEY ALL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ARE UNFIT OR ZERO,FIRST WE HAVE TO KNOW THAT WHAT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MEASUREMENT IS METER. HOW TO MEASURE THE BODY FIGURE Of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A MODEL ON SMARTNESS METER,IN THE WORLD THERE IS A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SIMPLE STANDARD.WHEN ANY FEMALE MODEL NEED WEAR TO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BRAZIERS UNDER OUR CLOTHES FOR PROMINENT/SHOW OUR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BREASTS, ITS MEAN SHE HAVE NOT GOOD FIGURE OR BREASTS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OR SHE HAVE SOME ABNORMALITY IN HER BREASTS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IN SHOWBIZ ALL FEMALE MODELS APPERAS WITH WEARING
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BRAZIER INSIDE OUR CLOTHES, AND WITH THESE KIND OF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRESSING HER BREASTS LOOKS LIKE AN ARTIFICIAL AIR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BALOONS,OR A KIND OF VEGETABLE, DUE TO THIS THE GIRLS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOST ALL OUR *** APPEAL AND ATTRACTION. IT IS A QUESTION
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FOR FEMALE MODELS , ARE THEY UNFIT ON WORLD'S STANDARDS?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> N WHY THEY CANT PERFORM OR CANNOT SHOW OUR BREASTS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WITHOUT WEARING BRAZIER INSIDE OUR CLOTHES. IN WESTERN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> STANDARDS SMART FEMALES HATE TO WEAR BRAZIER INSIDE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CLOTHS, BECAUSE THEY HAVE FIRM BREASTS AND DON'T NEED
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THE HELP OF BRAZIERS TO SHOW OR PROMINENT THEM TO PROVE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OURSELVES A COMPLETE FEMALE. IF A FEMALE WEAR BRAZIERS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> POEPLE THINK ABOUT THAT MAYBE SHE HAVE SMALL LOOSE OR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UNBALANCED BREASTS, OR MAYBE SHE HAVE SOME KIND OF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ABNORMALITY IN HER BREASTS AND TRYING TO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> COVER THIS DEFECT WITH THE HELP OF BRAZIERS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EVERY BODY KNOWS AND BELEAVE THAT WITHOUT BRAZIER
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BREASTS LOOKS 100 TIMES ATTRACTIVE BEAUTIFUL & ***Y IN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THEIR NATURAL CURVES, WHEN WOMEN APPEAR WITHOUT WEARING
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BRAZIERS INSIDE ****RT HER NATURAL BREASTS CURVES LOOKS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MANY TIMES NATURAL & ATTRACTIVE AND BREAK THE HEARTS OF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VIEWERS. THE CURVES OF BREASTS NIPPLES INSIDE FROM DRESS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WORK LIKE A BULLET THAT DIRECTLY HIT THIER HEARTS AND
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ITS DIFFICULT TO FORGET.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I REQUEST TO ALL POEPLE THAT ONLY GIVE CHANCE TO THESE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MODELS WHO CAN QUALIFY OURSELVES ON SMARTNESS STANDARD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ON THIS METHOD. I THINK MAYBE ALL MODELS WILLBE OUT N
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NEW GENERATION WILL COME INTO FA****ON N SHOWBIZ WHO WILL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QUALIFY THIS STANDARD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sms your comments to me at +92 300 9288263
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GIRLS USE BAZIERS TO HIDE DEFECTS,MAKE POEPLE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FOOL,INSIDE SMALL LOOSE UNABALANCE N FOAM OUTLOOK TIGHT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> N FIRM (36-38) ITS LIE FAKE N FRAUD DONT BELEAVE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Silvertop,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After a brief look through your post, I think Craig would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be very interested in the contents, especially regarding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the "BRAZIERS", so I have added demon.local to your post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the hopes that Craig will see it and possibly order a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brazier (sic) from you. If he has not answered your post
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> within the next forty-eight hours I shall add a s****ting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group to the groups line and repost.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH. HAND.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You provide such a good public service to Usenet, Wim!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I try to live by my motto: *Must* try harder.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it may reap dividends by Friday!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think so? (That's 320)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps. There are still many days to go... and the
>>>>>>>>>>> intervention of a certain Phillip Kyle may prove key!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I know. He and his secretary *and* his bot might at this very
>>>>>>>>>> moment have a veritable flood waiting behind the sluice gates.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hope you aren't insinuating that Phillip's posts are mere
>>>>>>>>> chaff!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does his secretary post as well? I haven't seen her. Perhaps she
>>>>>>>>> releases a few when she's bored of waiting for him to reply to
>>>>>>>>> the im****tant ones.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I often seem to lose stamina as the week goes on, *and* I've
>>>>>>>>>> got a bloody clinic to attend on Thursday. I might work a
>>>>>>>>>> double ****ft through tonight just in case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ahh, but what if there's no one around to reply to?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's that old karma thing working again...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I could create a sock called Deirdre Barlow or something equally
>>>>>>>> stupid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That would be cheating.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then I won't do it because cheaters never win.
>>>>>
>>>>> But wot about KK? You mean to say that he was always proper and
>>>>> honest in achieving his fortune?
>>>>
>>>> But KK is not a winner, oh no. When he is placed on the great scales
>>>> along with all of his illgotten gains he will still be found wanting.
>>>
>>> Good job you redeemed yourself with that post!
>>
>> THIS WEEK IS MINE, MINE I SAYS!
>
> It will be judging by the overnight tidal wave that I'm now responding
> to!
>
MUWHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAAAAA!
--
Phil Kyle, Interweb Leg end
http://philkyle2003.reachme.at/
"Can we put the recent unpleasantness behind us?"
- Craig "Fatboi" Oldfield
|
