go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip) wrote in
news:Xns94FBF0166C136meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Be still and pray homage to Illogic Bomb who posted this on 01 Jun
> 2004...
>
>> go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip) wrote in
>> news:Xns94FB5D9FCEF7Bmeowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Be still and pray homage to Illogic Bomb who posted this on 01 Jun
>>> 2004...
>>>
>>>> go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip) wrote in
>>>> news:Xns94FAC970E8C4meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - Monday 397 who posted this on
>>>>> 31 May 2004...
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:Xns94FA57932172Ameowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>> posted this on 31 May 2004...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:Xns94FA48CD606meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>
news:Xns94F9EED196C10meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>> e s
>>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>
news:Xns94F9EBD4BC535meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>> b l e s
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder! who
>>>>>>>>>>>>> posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> news:Xns94F9E853B7702meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Reverend Parson Peter Parsnip" <go@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> news:Xns94F9BB4CB6B73meowth@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Be still and pray homage to Wim Jay - *must* try harder!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who posted this on 30 May 2004...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "silvertop_10" <silvertop_10@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:3ec2d9a9.0405300616.4ae850ea@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I WANT TO POINT SOME FAULTS IN FEMALE (MODELS) APPEAR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ON TV, FILMS AND IN SONGS, IF WE MEASURE THE FIGURES
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OF THESE MODELS ON INTERNATIONAL SMARTNESS METER, THEY
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ALL ARE UNFIT OR ZERO,FIRST WE HAVE TO KNOW THAT WHAT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MEASUREMENT IS METER. HOW TO MEASURE THE BODY FIGURE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Of A MODEL ON SMARTNESS METER,IN THE WORLD THERE IS A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SIMPLE STANDARD.WHEN ANY FEMALE MODEL NEED WEAR TO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BRAZIERS UNDER OUR CLOTHES FOR PROMINENT/SHOW OUR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BREASTS, ITS MEAN SHE HAVE NOT GOOD FIGURE OR BREASTS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OR SHE HAVE SOME ABNORMALITY IN HER BREASTS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IN SHOWBIZ ALL FEMALE MODELS APPERAS WITH WEARING
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BRAZIER INSIDE OUR CLOTHES, AND WITH THESE KIND OF
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRESSING HER BREASTS LOOKS LIKE AN ARTIFICIAL AIR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BALOONS,OR A KIND OF VEGETABLE, DUE TO THIS THE GIRLS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOST ALL OUR *** APPEAL AND ATTRACTION. IT IS A
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QUESTION FOR FEMALE MODELS , ARE THEY UNFIT ON WORLD'S
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> STANDARDS? N WHY THEY CANT PERFORM OR CANNOT SHOW OUR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BREASTS WITHOUT WEARING BRAZIER INSIDE OUR CLOTHES. IN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WESTERN STANDARDS SMART FEMALES HATE TO WEAR BRAZIER
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INSIDE CLOTHS, BECAUSE THEY HAVE FIRM BREASTS AND
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DON'T NEED THE HELP OF BRAZIERS TO SHOW OR PROMINENT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THEM TO PROVE OURSELVES A COMPLETE FEMALE. IF A FEMALE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WEAR BRAZIERS POEPLE THINK ABOUT THAT MAYBE SHE HAVE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SMALL LOOSE OR UNBALANCED BREASTS, OR MAYBE SHE HAVE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SOME KIND OF ABNORMALITY IN HER BREASTS AND TRYING TO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> COVER THIS DEFECT WITH THE HELP OF BRAZIERS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EVERY BODY KNOWS AND BELEAVE THAT WITHOUT BRAZIER
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BREASTS LOOKS 100 TIMES ATTRACTIVE BEAUTIFUL & ***Y IN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THEIR NATURAL CURVES, WHEN WOMEN APPEAR WITHOUT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WEARING BRAZIERS INSIDE ****RT HER NATURAL BREASTS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CURVES LOOKS MANY TIMES NATURAL & ATTRACTIVE AND BREAK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THE HEARTS OF VIEWERS. THE CURVES OF BREASTS NIPPLES
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> INSIDE FROM DRESS WORK LIKE A BULLET THAT DIRECTLY HIT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> THIER HEARTS AND ITS DIFFICULT TO FORGET.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I REQUEST TO ALL POEPLE THAT ONLY GIVE CHANCE TO THESE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MODELS WHO CAN QUALIFY OURSELVES ON SMARTNESS STANDARD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ON THIS METHOD. I THINK MAYBE ALL MODELS WILLBE OUT N
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NEW GENERATION WILL COME INTO FA****ON N SHOWBIZ WHO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WILL QUALIFY THIS STANDARD.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sms your comments to me at +92 300 9288263
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GIRLS USE BAZIERS TO HIDE DEFECTS,MAKE POEPLE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FOOL,INSIDE SMALL LOOSE UNABALANCE N FOAM OUTLOOK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TIGHT N FIRM (36-38) ITS LIE FAKE N FRAUD DONT BELEAVE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Silvertop,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> After a brief look through your post, I think Craig
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be very interested in the contents, especially
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding the "BRAZIERS", so I have added demon.local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to your post in the hopes that Craig will see it and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly order a brazier (sic) from you. If he has not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> answered your post within the next forty-eight hours I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shall add a s****ting group to the groups line and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repost.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HTH. HAND.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You provide such a good public service to Usenet, Wim!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I try to live by my motto: *Must* try harder.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it may reap dividends by Friday!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you think so? (That's 320)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps. There are still many days to go... and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> intervention of a certain Phillip Kyle may prove key!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I know. He and his secretary *and* his bot might at this very
>>>>>>>>>>>> moment have a veritable flood waiting behind the sluice
>>>>>>>>>>>> gates.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I hope you aren't insinuating that Phillip's posts are mere
>>>>>>>>>>> chaff!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Does his secretary post as well? I haven't seen her. Perhaps
>>>>>>>>>>> she releases a few when she's bored of waiting for him to
>>>>>>>>>>> reply to the im****tant ones.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I often seem to lose stamina as the week goes on, *and* I've
>>>>>>>>>>>> got a bloody clinic to attend on Thursday. I might work a
>>>>>>>>>>>> double ****ft through tonight just in case.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ahh, but what if there's no one around to reply to?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's that old karma thing working again...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I could create a sock called Deirdre Barlow or something
>>>>>>>>>> equally stupid.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That would be cheating.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then I won't do it because cheaters never win.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But wot about KK? You mean to say that he was always proper and
>>>>>>> honest in achieving his fortune?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But KK is not a winner, oh no. When he is placed on the great
>>>>>> scales along with all of his illgotten gains he will still be found
>>>>>> wanting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Good job you redeemed yourself with that post!
>>>>
>>>> THIS WEEK IS MINE, MINE I SAYS!
>>>
>>> It will be judging by the overnight tidal wave that I'm now responding
>>> to!
>>
>> MUWHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAAAAA!
>
> I am doomed!
>
Yup.
--
Phil Kyle, Interweb Leg end
http://philkyle2003.reachme.at/
"Can we put the recent unpleasantness behind us?"
- Craig "Fatboi" Oldfield
|
