yttrstein@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<yttrstein@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
ygc> On May 16, 4:39?pm, cr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(i'll teach you to turn away.)
ygc> My opinion doesn't stop there, Lish. Let me make a suggestion:
ygc> I think you should back off and stop being a **** to Rachel. All you
know
ygc> about Rachel is that she had *** at least one time with the guy that
you
ygc> had (have?) a mad crush on for a number of years. I can understand
your
ygc> frustration at that.
haha, dude. i said one thing to her in recent days - this is
hardly actively being a ****. i said it here out of amusement. you should
know that.
that said, i'm not one to deny a crush, but you're really reading
a lot more into any feelings i had for shannon than existed. i've enjoyed
writing to him & i enjoyed meeting him, but if i wanted to go suck his
cock, i could've. it wasn't & isn't like that. i suppose you could be
badgering this whole "mad crush" thing for your own entertainment, but
it's a bit confusing to me since you seem to otherwise like keeping things
honest.
ygc> You should have emailed me during the whole debacle and asked me for
ygc> some information. I would have gladly forwarded you phone
conversations
ygc> and emails that I traded with shannon during it, and I guarantee you
...uh, i did. several times. you didn't reply once. would you like
me to pull the header information from my sent-mail?
lish "we don't even care
crank@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
whether or not we care." -ma
43.9% / 30 RANA 128 / 70
|
